This article was originally published at The Conversation. (opens in new tab) The publication contributed the article to Space.com’s Expert Voices: Op-Ed & Insights.
Andrew Gunn (opens in new tab)Lecturer, Monash University
What is it like to be on the surface of Mars or Venus? Or even further afield, such as on Pluto, or Saturn’s moon Titan?
This curiosity has driven advances in space exploration since Sputnik 1 was launched 65 years (opens in new tab) Aug. But we’re only beginning to scratch the surface of what is knowable about other planetary bodies in the solar system.
Our new study (opens in new tab)published May 19 in Nature Astronomy, shows how some unlikely candidates — namely sand dunes — can provide insight into what weather and conditions you might experience if you were standing on a far-off planetary body.
Related: Weird ‘blue’ dunes speckle the surface of Mars in NASA photo
What’s in a grain of sand?
English poet William Blake famously famous (opens in new tab) what it means “to see a world in a grain of sand.”
In our research, we took this quite literally. The idea was to use the mere presence of sand dunes to understand what conditions exist on a world’s surface.
For dunes to even exist, there are a pair of “Goldilocks (opens in new tab)” criteria that must be satisfied. First is a supply of erodible but durable grains. There must also be winds fast enough to make those grains hop across the ground — but not fast enough to carry them high into the atmosphere.
So far, the direct measurement of winds and sediment has only been possible on Earth and Mars. However, we have observed wind-blown sediment features on multiple other bodies (and even comets (opens in new tab)) by satellite. The very presence of such dunes on these bodies implies the Goldilocks conditions are met.
Our work focused on Venus, Earth, Mars, Titan, Triton (Neptune’s largest moon) and Pluto. Unresolved debates about these bodies have gone on for decades.
How do we square the apparent wind-blown features on Triton’s and Pluto’s surfaces with their thin, tenuous atmospheres? Why do we see such prolific sand and dust activity on Mars, despite measuring winds that seem too weak to sustain it?
And does Venus’s thick and stiflingly hot atmosphere move sand in a similar way to how air or water move on Earth?
furthering the debate
Our study offers predictions for the winds required to move sediment on these bodies, and how easily that sediment would break apart in those winds.
We constructed these predictions by piecing together results from a host of other research papers, and testing them against all the experimental data we could get our hands on.
We then applied the theories to each of the six bodies, drawing on telescope and satellite measurements of variables including gravity, atmospheric composition, surface temperature, and the strength of sediments.
Studies before ours have looked at either the wind speed threshold required to move sand, or the strength of various sediment particles. Our work combined these together — looking at how easily particles could break apart in sand-transporting weather on these bodies.
For example, we know Titan’s equator has sand dunes — but we aren’t sure of what sediment encircles the equator. Is it pure organic haze (opens in new tab) raining down from the atmosphere, or is it mixed with denser ice?
As it turns out, we discovered loose aggregates of organic haze would disintegrate upon collision if they were blown by the winds at Titan’s equator.
This implies Titan’s dunes are probably not made of purely organic haze. To build a dune, sediment must be blown around in the wind for a long time (some of Earth’s dune sands are a million years (opens in new tab) old).
We also found wind speeds would have to be excessively fast on Pluto to transport either methane or nitrogen ice (which is what Pluto’s dune sediments were hypothesized to be). This calls into question whether “dunes” on Pluto’s plain, Sputnik Planitia (opens in new tab)are dunes at all.
They may instead be sublimation waves (opens in new tab). These are dune-like landforms made from the sublimation of material, instead of sediment erosion (such as those seen on Mars’s north polar cap).
Our results for Mars suggest more dust is generated from wind-blown sand transport on Mars than on Earth. This suggests our models of the Martian atmosphere may not be effectively capturing Mars’s strong “katabatic” winds, which are cold gusts that blow downhill at night.
Potential for space exploration
This study comes at an interesting stage of space exploration.
For Mars, we have the relative abundance of observations; five space agencies are conducting active missions in orbit, or in situ. Studies such as ours help inform the objectives of these missions, and the paths taken by rovers such as Perseverance (opens in new tab) and Zhurong (opens in new tab).
In the outer reaches of the solar system, Triton has not been observed in detail since the NASA Voyager 2 flyby in 1989. There is currently a mission proposal (opens in new tab) which, if selected, would have a probe launched in 2031 to study Triton, before annihilating itself by flying into Neptune’s atmosphere.
Missions planned to Venus and Titan in the coming decade will revolutionize our understanding of these two. NASA’s Dragonfly (opens in new tab) mission, slated to leave Earth in 2027 and arrive on Titan in 2034, will land an uncrewed helicopter on the moon’s dunes.
Pluto was observed during a 2015 flyby (opens in new tab) by NASA’s ongoing New Horizons mission, but there are no plans to return.
This article is republished from The Conversation (opens in new tab) under the Creative Commons license. Read the original article (opens in new tab).
Follow all of the Expert Voices issues and debates — and become part of the discussion — on Facebook and Twitter. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.